Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Superzoom cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Panasonic DMC TZ101 vs Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Specs |
|
|
DMC TZ101
All specs: Main page for DMC TZ101 |
PowerShot SX50 HS
All specs: Main page for PowerShot SX50 HS |
|
DMC TZ101 vs PowerShot SX50 HS: The sensors |
|
|
DMC TZ101 features a 1″ sized sensor, while the PowerShot SX50 HS uses a Compact sensor. Boasting an area of 116mm² (0.19 sq.in.) the sensor of the DMC TZ101 is a lot larger than the PowerShot SX50 HS’s chip at 28mm² (0.04 sq.in.). In most cases a larger sensor will yield better results in low light, a considerable advantage in many situations (think: interior images, dusk or dawn etc.), a clear disadvantage of the Compact format. Better choice: Panasonic DMC TZ101 |
|
DMC TZ101 vs PowerShot SX50 HS: Viewfinder DMC TZ101 has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 1.16 megapixel with magnification of 0.46x. The PowerShot SX50 HS has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 0.20 megapixel, it’s magnification is 0.50x. Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x. |
||
|
DMC TZ101 (0.46x) |
PowerShot SX50 HS (0.50x) |
|
|
Advantage: Canon PowerShot SX50 HS |
||
|
Panasonic DMC TZ101 VS Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Panasonic DMC TZ101 a better choice |
||
|
DMC TZ101 |
PowerShot SX50 HS |
|
| Larger sensor (5) | 1″ | Compact |
| Wider resolution (5, megapixel) | 20.10 | 12.00 |
| Higher speed (4, frames/second) | 10 | 2 |
| Auto Focus points (4) | 49 | 9 |
| Better sensibility (4) | 80 – 25600 ISO | 80 – 6400 ISO |
| Better viewfinder (4, Megapixel) | 1.16 | 0.20 |
| Better monitor (2, Megapixel) | 1.04 | 0.46 |
| Touch screen (2) | ||
| Better Video (2) | 3840 x 2160 | 1920 x 1080 |
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 320 | 315 |
| Weighs less (2) | 310g (10.0 oz.) |
598g (19.3 oz.) |
| More portable (2) | 317cm³ (20 cu.in.) |
1133cm³ (71 cu.in.) |
| WiFi (2) | ||
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the DMC TZ101 are the larger sensor, the higher resolution and that the camera is faster. Additional pros for the Panasonic are the faster and more accurate auto focus, the larger sensitivity and the better viewfinder. We also like that the display has a higher resolution, the rather comfortable touch screen and the superior video recording. A recommendation of the DMC TZ101 is made easy by that the battery has more stamina, the lower weight than the PowerShot SX50 HS and the more compact size. Finally, there’s the the built-in wifi that permits remote shooting and image transfer without the need for a cable connection. The DMC TZ101 scores 41 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Canon PowerShot SX50 HS |
||
|
DMC TZ101 |
PowerShot SX50 HS |
|
| Articulated monitor (2) | ||
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the PowerShot SX50 HS are the articulated display. Yields 2 points for the PowerShot SX50 HS. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
DMC TZ101 |
PowerShot SX50 HS |
|
| Built-in flash | ||
| Image stabilizer | ||
| Panasonic DMC TZ101 VS Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the DMC TZ101 and PowerShot SX50 HS |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Panasonic DMC TZ101 |
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS |
|
41
|
2
|
|
We recommend Panasonic DMC TZ101 as better choice. |
|