Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Superzoom cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Panasonic DMC TZ101 vs Sony Cyber-shot RX10 IV Specs |
|
|
DMC TZ101
All specs: Main page for DMC TZ101 |
Cyber-shot RX10 IV
All specs: Main page for Cyber-shot RX10 IV |
|
DMC TZ101 vs Cyber-shot RX10 IV Sensors |
|
|
On the pictures below the sensor areas of cameras are highlighted. This infographic highlights the sensor areas of both models compared to other common sensor formats:
Note: 1-Euro coin for scale; the coin at 23.25mm diameter is slightly smaller than a US quarter. 1″ sensor built into both cameras has a total area of about 116mm² (4.6 sq.in.). |
|
DMC TZ101 vs Cyber-shot RX10 IV: Viewfinder DMC TZ101 has an electronic viewfinder and it’s resolution is 1.16 megapixel with magnification of 0.46x. The Cyber-shot RX10 IV has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 2.36 megapixel, it’s magnification is 0.70x. Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x. |
||
|
DMC TZ101 (0.46x) |
Cyber-shot RX10 IV (0.70x) |
|
|
Better choice: Sony Cyber-shot RX10 IV |
||
|
Panasonic DMC TZ101 VS Sony Cyber-shot RX10 IV Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Panasonic DMC TZ101 a better choice |
||
|
DMC TZ101 |
Cyber-shot RX10 IV |
|
| Better sensibility (4) | 80 – 25600 ISO | 100 – 12800 ISO |
| Weighs less (2) | 310g (10.0 oz.) |
1095g (35.3 oz.) |
| More portable (2) | 317cm³ (20 cu.in.) |
1587cm³ (100 cu.in.) |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the DMC TZ101 are the larger sensitivity, the lower weight than the Cyber-shot RX10 IV and the more compact size. The DMC TZ101 scores 8 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Sony Cyber-shot RX10 IV |
||
|
DMC TZ101 |
Cyber-shot RX10 IV |
|
| Higher speed (4, frames/second) | 10 | 24 |
| Auto Focus points (4) | 49 | 315 |
| Better viewfinder (4, Megapixel) | 1.16 | 2.36 |
| Better monitor (2, Megapixel) | 1.04 | 1.44 |
| Articulated monitor (2) | ||
| External microphone (2) | ||
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 320 | 400 |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the Cyber-shot RX10 IV are that the camera is faster, the faster and more accurate auto focus and the better viewfinder. We also like that the display has a higher resolution, the articulated display and the connector for an external microphone. Another advantage over the DMC TZ101: that the battery has more stamina. Yields 21 points for the Cyber-shot RX10 IV. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
DMC TZ101 |
Cyber-shot RX10 IV |
|
| Sensor format | 1″ | 1″ |
| Resolution (megapixel) | 20.10 | 20.10 |
| Built-in flash | ||
| Image stabilizer | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Video resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 |
| WiFi | ||
| Panasonic DMC TZ101 VS Sony Cyber-shot RX10 IV Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the DMC TZ101 and Cyber-shot RX10 IV |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Panasonic DMC TZ101 |
Sony Cyber-shot RX10 IV |
|
8
|
21
|
|
We recommend Sony Cyber-shot RX10 IV as better choice. |
|