Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Enthusiast Compact cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Sony Cyber-shot RX100 vs Ricoh GR III Specs |
|
|
Cyber-shot RX100
All specs: Main page for Cyber-shot RX100 |
GR III
All specs: Main page for GR III |
|
Cyber-shot RX100 vs GR III Sensors |
|
|
On the pictures below the sensor areas of cameras are highlighted. This infographic highlights the sensor areas of both models compared to other common sensor formats: Note: 1-Euro coin for scale; the coin at 23.25mm diameter is slightly smaller than a US quarter. Featuring an area of 372mm² (0.60 sq.in.), the GR III’s sensor is a lot larger that the chip that the Cyber-shot RX100 employs at 116mm² (0.19 sq.in.). A larger sensor can produce images of interiors or at night that have less noise and better contrast than photos shot with 1″ sized chips. Better choice: Ricoh GR III |
|
Sony Cyber-shot RX100 VS Ricoh GR III Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Sony Cyber-shot RX100 a better choice |
||
|
Cyber-shot RX100 |
GR III |
|
| Higher speed (4, frames/second) | 10 | 4 |
| Auto Focus points (4) | 25 | 9 |
| Built-in flash (2) | ||
| Better monitor (2, Megapixel) | 1.20 | 1.04 |
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 330 | 200 |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the Cyber-shot RX100 are that the camera is faster, the faster and more accurate auto focus and the built-in flash. A nice touch is that the display has a higher resolution and that the battery has more stamina. The Cyber-shot RX100 scores 15 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Ricoh GR III |
||
|
Cyber-shot RX100 |
GR III |
|
| Larger sensor (5) | 1″ | APS-C |
| Sensor cleaning (3) | ||
| Wider resolution (5, megapixel) | 20.10 | 24.00 |
| Better sensibility (4) | 160 – 12800 ISO | 100 – 102400 ISO |
| Touch screen (2) | ||
| WiFi (2) | ||
| USB 3.0 (2) | ||
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the GR III are the larger sensor, built-in automatic sensor cleaning and the higher resolution. Additional pros for the Ricoh are the larger sensitivity, the rather comfortable touch screen and the built-in wifi that permits remote shooting and image transfer without the need for a cable connection. Finally, there’s the the support for USB 3.0. HArdly a luxury, given today’s image size and the requirements of 4K video. Yields 23 points for the GR III. |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
Cyber-shot RX100 |
GR III |
|
| Image stabilizer | ||
| Video resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 |
| Similar weight | 240g | 257g |
| Similar size | 213cm³ | 225cm³ |
| Sony Cyber-shot RX100 VS Ricoh GR III Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the Cyber-shot RX100 and GR III |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Sony Cyber-shot RX100 |
Ricoh GR III |
|
15
|
23
|
|
We recommend Ricoh GR III as better choice. |
|