Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.
Cameras which are being compared are Superzoom cameras.
Learn more about compared cameras specifications below. |
|
|
Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II vs Sony Cyber-shot HX50 (V) Specs |
|
|
DMC FZ1000 II
All specs: Main page for DMC FZ1000 II |
Cyber-shot HX50 (V)
All specs: Main page for Cyber-shot HX50 (V) |
|
DMC FZ1000 II vs Cyber-shot HX50 (V): The sensors |
|
|
The DMC FZ1000 II features a 1″ sized sensor, while the Cyber-shot HX50 (V) uses a Compact sensor. Boasting an area of 116mm² (0.19 sq.in.) the sensor of the DMC FZ1000 II is a lot larger than the Cyber-shot HX50 (V)’s chip at 28mm² (0.04 sq.in.). In most cases a larger sensor will yield better results in low light, a considerable advantage in many situations (think: interior images, dusk or dawn etc.), a clear disadvantage of the Compact format. Better choice: Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II |
|
Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II VS Sony Cyber-shot HX50 (V) Other Specs Comparison |
|
Why is Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II a better choice |
||
|
DMC FZ1000 II |
Cyber-shot HX50 (V) |
|
| Larger sensor (5) | 1″ | Compact |
| Higher speed (4, frames/second) | 12 | 10 |
| Auto Focus points (4) | 49 | 1 |
| Better sensibility (4) | 125 – 12800 ISO | 100 – 3200 ISO |
| Better monitor (2, Megapixel) | 1.24 | 0.92 |
| Articulated monitor (2) | ||
| Touch screen (2) | ||
| Better Video (2) | 4096 x 2160 | 1920 x 1080 |
| External microphone (2) | ||
| Longer battery life (3, photos) | 440 | 400 |
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the DMC FZ1000 II are the larger sensor, that the camera is faster and the faster and more accurate auto focus. Additional pros for the Panasonic are the larger sensitivity, that the display has a higher resolution and the articulated display. A recommendation of the DMC FZ1000 II is made easy by the rather comfortable touch screen, the superior video recording and the connector for an external microphone. Another advantage over the Cyber-shot HX50 (V): that the battery has more stamina. The DMC FZ1000 II scores 30 points. |
||
|
Otherwise why to choose Sony Cyber-shot HX50 (V) |
||
|
DMC FZ1000 II |
Cyber-shot HX50 (V) |
|
| Wider resolution (5, megapixel) | 20.10 | 20.40 |
| Weighs less (2) | 810g (26.1 oz.) |
272g (8.8 oz.) |
| More portable (2) | 1738cm³ (110 cu.in.) |
263cm³ (17 cu.in.) |
| GPS (2) | ||
|
Conclusion: Advantages of the Cyber-shot HX50 (V) are the higher resolution, the lower weight than the DMC FZ1000 II and the more compact size. Finally, there’s the the built-in GPS. Yields 11 points for the Cyber-shot HX50 (V). |
||
|
Common Specs for both cameras compared |
||
|
DMC FZ1000 II |
Cyber-shot HX50 (V) |
|
| Built-in flash | ||
| Image stabilizer | ||
| WiFi | ||
| Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II VS Sony Cyber-shot HX50 (V) Dimensions |
|
Look at front view of the DMC FZ1000 II and Cyber-shot HX50 (V) |
|
Top view of cameras |
|
|
Total scores Here’s the total score according to comparison above: |
|
|
Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II |
Sony Cyber-shot HX50 (V) |
|
30
|
11
|
|
We recommend Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II as better choice. |
|
